Begging the Question

As I understand it this phrase is misused all the time. It means something along the lines of assuming information not in evidence, stuff not proved. It's a logical fallacy, "petitio principi" in Latin, discovered by people who cared about logic and reason and argumentation and the truth. Neurotics, that is.

Too much of our internal energy has been allocated to the intestines for digestion, it would seem, and there isn't enough left to tackle the truth and other such naggingly abstract topics, and what does it matter anyway. The whole point of our existence as a species was to master the world and we have pretty much done that.

So it's time to relax and kick back and enjoy the fruits of our good fortune. But, you know, I'm neurotic and I can't let it go, that anachronistic concern for reason and reality, due to a faulty upbringing, no doubt, so I wonder what the elephant is in the bathroom taking a shit. The elephant, the false premise, has got to be fear. 

We assume there's something we need to be afraid of and that, even if there is, it's somehow productive to live in a chronic state of fear rather than dealing with the scary things above-board and rationally. So we argue about how to deal with the threats on the assumption that there are threats but there are not threats in evidence.

Prove to me that there are. How many times over do you have to be able to destroy the world before you feel safe or what the fuck good does it do you, having enough nukes to annihilate the entire solar system, or at least all of the planets. We might as well get rid of the whole arsenal, an interesting idea. We could bury it in Alaska.

We could then try to live in peace with our fellow humans or even bribe them into submission and still come out ahead. It turns out, though, according to my sources, that the rest of the world is pretty fed up with us. And scared, since it seems that we think it's our right to attack anyone we want whenever we want.

Interesting, to think that we are the thing to be afraid of, even the thing for us to be afraid of, and that we should be afraid of ourselves. I'm heading off now to try to neurotically get a handle on that and consider that it might be a mechanism or in some way true, that the fearers are to be feared. You can be my bot.

Help me grind it out by processing all the info, that is, be a bot for truth. Better than bots for fear, I think, or bots for war, though I believe that bot-hood generally is not the way to go. People can and should do better. It would help if we could get past the fear. Let's work on that. Oh, no, I just remembered the elephant.

The plumbing, now there's something to worry about.