A New Measure

I want to propose new measure and standard of genocidal destructiveness. Let's call it a COULTER, in honor of Ann, defined as the deaths of ten thousand amalgamated individuals, meaning a hypothetical mish-mash of people of every known tribe and tradition.

This unit is unavoidably indeterminate, but we've got to start somewhere, and a HOLOCAUST, another possible measure, is just too big. People can't relate to it. And the targeted persons were all of one tribe, so if messes with the valuation of the currency.

Whether or not someone identifies with the tribe being decimated, I mean to say, would have an effect, so thank God we have Ann, since she's so unabashedly ethnocentric and shouldn't object to the honor, genocide being the ultimate expression of tribal militancy.

And Ann has long ago owned her ethnic chauvinism. That gauntlet has been thrown down with emphasis. Starting with the invasion of Iraq we can see immediately that it's too one-sided to be called a war and may qualify as genocide. It can be assigned a COULTER score.

Let's say of ten, for the sake of argument. I have no idea if it makes any sense or is accurate. None, whatsoever, at all. It's not the point. The point is that by assigning a number you are forced to make an evaluation, to pay attention and, one hopes, to care. That is the goal.

It's what Ann and her followers refuse to do. To look, evaluate, and care, so we have made good use of her in the end. The karmic balance of the universe may not have been restored, as it never probably will be, but a step has been taken in that direction. Thank you, Ann.

For once your name has been well used.